6^th European Congress on Neurology and Brain Disorders (Scopus Indexed)

Coalesce Research Group invites all the participants across the globe to attend the “6^th European Congress on Neurology and Brain Disorders” (Neurology Congress 2022) during November 17-18, 2022, at Hotel Isola Sacra Rome Airport, Rome, Italy includes prompt Keynote Speaker, presentations, Oral talks, Poster presentations, and Exhibition.

This highly exciting “6^th European Congress on Neurology and Brain Disorderss” (Neurology Congress 2022) is intended to be a forum, discussion, and networking place for academics, researchers, professionals, administrators, educational leaders, and industry representatives, and Business leaders.  The theme of the Conference is: “Integrated Approach to Identifying Solutions in the field of Neurology and Brain Disorders”. Neurology Congress offers various topics for knowing advanced details and for interaction including types of Neurological Disorders, Alzheimer’s, Dementia, Parkinson's Diseases, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Pediatric Neurology, Epilepsy, and many more.

The 2-days conference in Rome, Italy will become a must-attend event for the Neurology department to hear about future infrastructure project plans, government strategies, and market-leading innovation. This year’s conference will cover a broad range of Neurological Disorders, Alzheimer’s, Dementia and Parkinsons' Diseases, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Pediatric Neurology, Epilepsy, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Psychology.

Target Audience for Conference:

• Academic Experts in Neurology
• Neurologists and Directors
• Neuroscientists Specialists
• Healthcare Professionals
• Neurosurgeons
• Psychiatrists

Who can attend?

• Academic Experts in Neurology
• Neurologists and Directors
• Neuroscientists Specialists
• Healthcare Professionals
• Neurosurgeons
• Psychiatrists
• Research Institutions
• Young Researchers & Student Researchers
• Laboratories- Academic Faculty and Student
• Associations, Societies, and Professional Bodies Industries
• Non – Governmental Organizations

Guidelines For Speakers

• Keep the number of slides in your presentation to a minimum and follow the assigned slots.
• Please stop when signaled to do so by the Chair.
• Personal laptops should not be used unless in any unavoidable conditions.
• The Videos will not be recorded.
• Question Sessions, thanks, and acknowledgment of the speakers will take place during the session or after completion of the session, so please stay until the end of the session.

Guidelines For Poster

• Each poster should be approximately 1x1 M in Size The title, contents, text and the author’s information should be clearly visible even from 1-2 feet.
• Present numerical data in the form of graphs, rather than tables.
• If data must be presented in table form, keep it simple to be easily understandable.
• Visuals should be simple, clear, and bold. Avoid acronyms and mathematical notations as much as possible.
• Posters with 800-1000 words or less are perfect.
• Avoid submitting compactly packed, highly worded- count posters.
• Categorize your poster into subdivisions, e.g., Introduction, Methods, Results; Discussion, Conclusions, and Literature Cited.
• Use bright colors to enhance the better visibility Besides your project, you can also include future research plans or questions.

Abstract Peer-review Process/Guidelines:

The Reviewing Committee of the Conference ensures a high-quality peer-review process for all abstracts submitted to ensure adherence to the conference scope and abstracts which have passed this initial screening are then assigned to the session chair/review committee for evaluation.

The decision of abstract acceptance will be decided by a panel of experts emphasizing whether the findings and/or conclusions are novel and make useful contributions to the field.

The committee operates a single/double-blind peer review process for all the abstracts submitted, where both the reviewer and the author remain anonymous.

Once the reviews have been received, the review committee decides to accept or reject a manuscript, or to request revisions from the author in response to the reviewers’ comments. If the decision tends to be a minor revision or major revision, authors will be given 14 days to resubmit the revised abstract.

Criteria to be considered for Scoring:

The abstract will be reviewed according to the following criteria:

• The originality of concept/approach and level of innovativeness
• Significance/impact/relevance to conference theme
• Quality of research design/theoretical argument
• Conclusions and interpretations of results
• Presentation style: Coherence and clarity of structure